Jamie AI Pricing vs Kuno: Total Cost Compared (2026)

Jamie AI costs €0 on the free plan, €25/month for Plus, €47/month for Pro, and €39/month per seat for Team, with a custom-priced Enterprise tier. Paying annually cuts each paid plan by about 17%. There’s a free plan (10 meetings/month, 30-minute cap), so you can test it before paying. This guide breaks down every plan, the real yearly cost, and how Jamie compares to Kuno — a privacy-first AI voice recorder, made in Germany, built for the in-person and field meetings a laptop app can’t always reach.

💶 Quick answer — Jamie pricing at a glance (verified June 2026)

• Free: €0 — 10 meetings/month, 30-min limit.
• Plus: €25/mo (or €21/mo billed annually) — 20 meetings/month, 2h limit.
• Pro: €47/mo (or €39/mo billed annually) — unlimited meetings, 3h limit.
• Team: €39/mo per seat (or €33/seat billed annually), 2+ seats — unlimited, centralized billing.
• Enterprise: custom — SSO, DPAs, ISO 27001, EU data residency.
• Annual billing saves ≈ 17%. Jamie is bot-free, hosted in Germany, and GDPR-compliant. Pricing pages change, and most “Jamie pricing” articles quietly go stale. The numbers below were taken directly from Jamie’s official pricing page and verified in June 2026 — but always confirm the live figure at checkout before you buy. More importantly, the right question isn’t only “what does Jamie cost?” but “what am I paying for, and is it the right shape for how I actually meet?”

---

How much does Jamie AI cost? Full plan breakdown

Jamie uses a tiered, per-seat model. The headline price you see depends on whether you pay monthly or annually (annual is billed up front and works out ~17% cheaper per month). The table below shows both, plus what each tier unlocks.

Plan	Monthly price	Annual price (per month)	Meetings / month	Max meeting length	Best for
Free	€0	€0	10	30 minutes	Trying Jamie, light users
Plus	€25	€21 (€250/yr)	20	2 hours	Busy professionals
Pro	€47	€39 (€470/yr)	Unlimited	3 hours	High-volume / power users
Team	€39 / seat	€33 / seat (€390/yr)	Unlimited	3 hours	Startups & growing teams (2+)
Enterprise	Custom	Custom	Unlimited	3 hours	Regulated / large orgs (10+)
All paid tiers include unlimited storage, speaker recognition, task detection, the “Ask Jamie” chat, and support for both online platforms and in-person meetings. The jumps between tiers are mostly about volume (meetings per month), meeting length, templates, and integrations.

Is there a free version of Jamie?

Yes. Jamie’s Free plan currently costs €0 and gives you 10 meetings per month with a 30-minute duration cap per meeting. It still includes the core experience — AI notes, transcripts, action items, speaker recognition and support for over 80 transcription and summary languages — so it’s a genuine way to evaluate the product, not a crippled demo. The limits you’ll hit first are the 10-meeting ceiling and the 30-minute cutoff, which is short for most real meetings. If either pinches, Plus is the next step up.

What’s the difference between Jamie Plus and Pro?

This is the most common upgrade decision, so it’s worth being precise. Both are single-user plans; the gap is about how much you meet and what you connect to.

Factor	Plus (€25/mo)	Pro (€47/mo)
Meetings / month	20	Unlimited
Max meeting length	2 hours	3 hours
Custom templates	3	Unlimited
Advanced integrations	Notion, Google Docs, OneNote	• Salesforce, HubSpot, Asana, etc.
Ideal user	~1 meeting/workday	Back-to-back days, CRM workflows
Rule of thumb: if you run more than ~20 meetings a month, regularly exceed two hours, or need to push notes into a CRM like Salesforce or HubSpot, Pro pays for itself. If your week is lighter and Notion/Google Docs is enough, Plus is the better value.

How much does Jamie cost for teams?

The Team plan is €39/month per seat (€33/seat billed annually), starts at 2 seats, and adds centralized billing, a shared team workspace and tags, encryption at rest and in transit, and user management. For larger or regulated organizations, Enterprise is custom-priced (10+ seats) and layers on SAML SSO, admin controls, volume discounts, EU data residency, DPAs and ISO 27001, plus a dedicated account manager.

Does Jamie charge per meeting or per seat?

Per seat, not per meeting — but with a meeting cap on the lower tiers. Free is limited to 10 meetings/month and Plus to 20; Pro, Team and Enterprise are unlimited. So you’re never billed for an individual meeting, but on Free/Plus you can run out of allowance before the month ends. Teams multiply the per-seat price by the number of users, which is where annual costs add up fast — see the next section.

What does Jamie actually cost per year? (Total cost)

Headline monthly prices understate the real spend, because most tools are billed for a full year. Here’s the annualized picture, including the savings from paying up front.

Plan	Billed monthly (per year)	Billed annually (per year)	You save
Free	€0	€0	—
Plus	€300	€250	€50
Pro	€564	€470	€94
Team (per seat)	€468	€390	€78

🧮 Worked example — a 5-person consultancy (original cost model) Five consultants on Team, billed annually: 5 × €390 = €1,950/year. The same five on Pro, billed monthly: 5 × €564 = €2,820/year — about €870 more for losing the team workspace and the annual discount. Lesson: for any team of two or more, the Team tier billed annually is almost always the cheaper and more capable option. Recalculate with your real seat count before committing.

Is Jamie worth the price?

For the right user, yes. Jamie is one of the stronger privacy-first, bot-free options because it captures your device’s audio directly instead of sending a bot into the call. Its current docs say audio is uploaded to Frankfurt, processed, then deleted after the transcript is ready; the transcript is stored in Frankfurt; and meeting-note generation may use Anthropic or OpenAI APIs without storage or model training. That makes it a defensible choice for lawyers, consultants, executives and anyone in a regulated field who simply can’t have a bot in the room. The honest trade-off: Jamie sits at the premium end of the market. If you only need an occasional transcript, cheaper or free alternatives exist; what you pay extra for here is the no-bot model and EU-centered data handling.

Does Jamie use a meeting bot?

No. Jamie is bot-free by design. Instead of a visible participant joining your Zoom, Teams or Meet call, the desktop (Mac/Windows) and iOS apps capture the audio playing through your device plus your microphone. That keeps the recording discreet and means the same app also works for in-person conversations — there’s no call for a bot to join.

Is Jamie GDPR-compliant and where is the data stored?

Jamie states that it is hosted in the EU and GDPR-compliant; Enterprise adds DPAs and ISO 27001. Its docs describe the data flow more precisely: audio is uploaded to a server location in Frankfurt, processed in a serverless GPU environment, then deleted after transcription; the transcript is stored in Frankfurt, and notes may be generated through Anthropic or OpenAI APIs where Jamie says data is not stored or used for training. This matters for the comparison below: the difference between Jamie and Kuno is not that one is compliant and the other isn’t — both are German and privacy-first. The difference is architecture: Jamie uses a privacy-conscious cloud workflow; Kuno transcribes on the device itself, so the audio never leaves the room at all.

Can Jamie record in-person meetings?

Yes — because it captures device audio and your mic, Jamie works for face-to-face meetings as well as video calls, as long as you have the app open on a laptop or phone within earshot. That’s its main overlap with Kuno. Where they diverge is the scenario: Jamie assumes you’re at your computer; a dedicated recorder assumes you’re not.

What changes if you use Jamie’s iPhone app for in-person meetings?

Jamie is no longer only a laptop note-taker. The current App Store listing describes Jamie as an iPhone recorder for in-person meetings, with pause/continue, microphone-based audio recording, speaker-aware transcripts, summaries, action items and sync between iPhone and desktop. That narrows the form-factor gap, but it does not make Jamie and Kuno the same product: Jamie is still an app workflow; Kuno is a dedicated on-device recorder for rooms, field work and meetings where visible hardware controls matter.

Decision point	Jamie iPhone app	Kuno implication
Can it record away from a laptop?	Yes. The iPhone app can record in-person meetings from the phone microphone, pause/continue during the conversation, and sync notes across iPhone and desktop. It does not record phone calls or system audio from the iPhone.	If you already work from an iPhone, Jamie can cover lightweight in-person capture. For workshops, site visits and consent-sensitive rooms, a purpose-built table recorder is still the cleaner form factor.
Where does the audio go?	Jamie documents a privacy-conscious cloud flow: audio is uploaded to Frankfurt, processed, deleted after the transcript is ready, and the transcript is stored in Frankfurt; note generation may use Anthropic/OpenAI APIs without storage or training.	Kuno’s stricter wedge is architectural: transcription happens on-device, so the raw audio does not need to leave the device for the most sensitive step.
How is consent handled?	Jamie recommends a manual announcement and can send an automated recording notice 24 hours before the meeting if the calendar is connected; legal basis and transparency remain the user’s responsibility as data controller.	Kuno should lean on visible in-room consent signals: a visible recording indicator plus one-tap/physical stop makes the recording state obvious during the meeting itself.
When is Jamie the better fit?	Desktop-centric teams that want bot-free notes across online and occasional in-person meetings, especially when a phone on the table is acceptable.	Kuno is the stronger fit when the meeting happens away from a laptop/phone workflow, when room capture is recurring, or when on-device transcription and physical controls are procurement requirements.
Practical takeaway: Jamie’s mobile app makes it a stronger in-person software option than older pricing pages suggested. The Kuno comparison should therefore stay fair: not “Jamie cannot record in person,” but “Jamie records through an app and privacy-conscious cloud workflow; Kuno records through dedicated hardware and on-device transcription.”

---

Jamie vs Kuno: which is right for you?

Both Jamie and Kuno are German, privacy-first, and bot-free — so a fair comparison isn’t about who’s “more GDPR.” It’s about form factor and where the audio is processed. Jamie is software that runs on your laptop or phone and transcribes in its EU cloud. Kuno is a dedicated hardware voice recorder that transcribes on-device, purpose-built for the meetings you walk into without a computer open: the client visit, the site walk-through, the corridor conversation, the field appointment.

Dimension	Jamie	Kuno
What it is	Software app (Mac, Windows, iOS)	Dedicated hardware voice recorder
Where audio is processed	Jamie cloud workflow: audio uploaded to Frankfurt, processed, then deleted; notes may use Anthropic/OpenAI APIs with no storage/training per Jamie docs	On-device — audio never leaves the device
Meeting bot	None	None
Built for	Desktop-centric online + in-person meetings	In-person & field meetings, hands-free
Origin / hosting	Made in Germany, EU-hosted	Made in Germany, EU-hosted, no training on recordings
Cost model	Per-seat monthly SaaS (€0–€47+/seat)	Hardware device · early access (pricing not yet public)
In plain terms: if your meetings happen in front of a screen, Jamie is an excellent, privacy-respecting choice. If your most important conversations happen away from the desk — on the shop floor, at a customer’s site, in a care setting, in the field — a phone app running in your pocket is the wrong tool, and a dedicated recorder that processes everything locally is the better fit.

▶ Capture the meetings that never happen at a laptop — without sending audio to any cloud. Kuno is a privacy-first AI voice recorder made in Germany. It records and transcribes your in-person meetings on-device — the audio never leaves the room — with EU data hosting and no training on your recordings. A visible recording indicator shows everyone when capture is on, and a one-tap stop switch pauses it instantly, so consent is clean and obvious. No bot, no laptop required. Get early access → Kuno’s pricing isn’t published yet — it’s in early access — but the cost structure differs from Jamie’s by design: a hardware device for the field, rather than a recurring per-seat software subscription. The two aren’t mutually exclusive, either: many teams will keep a desktop note-taker for video calls and add a dedicated on-device recorder for everything that happens in person.

Common mistakes when comparing Jamie’s price

• Comparing the monthly sticker price to a rival’s annual price. Always line up like-for-like: monthly vs monthly, or annual vs annual.
• Buying Pro when Team is cheaper. For 2+ users, Team (annual) usually costs less per seat and adds a shared workspace — don’t stack individual Pro seats.
• Ignoring the meeting cap. Free (10) and Plus (20) have monthly limits; if you run more, you’ve effectively outgrown the plan regardless of price.
• Assuming “EU-hosted” and “on-device” are the same thing. They’re not. EU cloud processing (Jamie) is strong; on-device processing (Kuno) is stricter still — the audio never leaves the hardware.
• Forgetting the form factor. A per-seat app is great at the desk and useless for the meeting you walk into without a laptop. Match the tool to where you actually meet.

Troubleshooting: getting the price you expected

• The price looks higher than this article. Jamie’s list prices can change; the figures here are verified June 2026. Check the live total at checkout, and confirm whether the displayed number is the monthly or the annual-billed rate.
• You wanted annual savings but were charged the monthly rate. Annual billing (~17% off) is a separate toggle — make sure it’s selected before paying.
• Your team’s bill is bigger than expected. Remember Team is per seat — multiply by your headcount. Drop unused seats before renewal.
• You only need in-person capture, not a full SaaS seat. A per-seat subscription may be more than you need for field work; a dedicated on-device recorder is a different (often better-fitting) model for that job.
• You can’t have any audio leave your premises. No cloud tool clears that bar by definition; you need on-device processing. → See: on-device vs cloud transcription Kuno is a privacy-first AI voice recorder, made in Germany, that captures and transcribes in-person meetings on-device with EU data hosting and no training on your recordings. Related: → Best AI note taker for in-person meetings · → Bot-free meeting recorder · → On-device vs cloud transcription · → Otter.ai pricing explained · → Best AI voice recorder 2026

---