Loom alternative

The best Loom alternative in 2026 depends on what you optimise for: Tella for polished async videos with a one-click Loom import, Cap or OBS Studio for free and open-source recording, SendRec for EU-hosted, GDPR-native self-hosting, Vidyard for sales, and Screen Studio for studio-quality Mac demos. Pick by data control and budget first — the features sort themselves out after that.

💡 Quick answer Best all-round Loom replacement: Tella (polished editing + Loom migration tool). Best free / open-source: Cap and OBS Studio. Most data-sovereign (EU-hosted / self-hosted): SendRec, or Cap with your own storage region. Best for sales teams: Vidyard (analytics + CRM). Best for Mac demo quality: Screen Studio (one-time licence option). Capturing an in-person meeting, not your screen? That’s a different tool entirely — see the last section. One reason “Loom alternative” keeps trending: after Atlassian acquired Loom, the free Starter plan is capped at 25 recordings, a 5-minute limit per video and 720p, while paid plans now run $18/user/month (Business) and $24/user/month (Business + AI) billed monthly — roughly $15 and $20 on an annual contract (Loom/Atlassian pricing, verified June 2026). For many small teams that pricing, plus the seat changes Atlassian rolled out, is the trigger to look elsewhere.

Why look for a Loom alternative in 2026?

Loom still does async video well. But four recurring frustrations send people searching:

• Price and seat changes. The 5-minute, 25-video free tier is tight, and previously-free Creator Lite seats are being converted to full paid seats under Atlassian (verified June 2026).
• Data residency. Loom is a US-hosted Atlassian product. Teams in regulated or EU markets increasingly want to know where recordings live and whether they can self-host.
• Editing depth. Trimming and stitching are fine, but creators who want zoom effects, AI cleanups and studio polish look to purpose-built editors.
• Lock-in. Your library lives on Loom’s cloud; exporting and migrating is an afterthought. None of these means Loom is “bad” — it means the right tool depends on your priorities. Below, the eight strongest alternatives, compared on the axis most listicles skip: where your data lives and who controls it.

What are the best Loom alternatives? (compared)

The table compares the main tools you’ll actually shortlist. Prices are the lowest paid tier, verified against each vendor’s own pricing page in June 2026; always reconfirm before buying, as this category changes fast.

⚠️ Pricing and free-tier limits in this category move constantly. The figures above were checked against each maker’s own page in June 2026 — confirm the live plan before you commit, especially Screen Studio, Vidyard and Cap Pro, whose tiers shift.

Tella — the best all-round Loom replacement

Tella is the closest “upgrade path” from Loom: it records screen and webcam, then gives you timeline and transcript-based editing, auto-zoom, backgrounds, AI filler-word/silence removal, and hosted share links with analytics. It supports 106 languages, exports up to 4K, allows clips up to 6 hours, and — crucially for switchers — ships a Loom migration tool. Tella restructured its plans in 2026: current listings show Pro at ~$19/user/month (the earlier ~$13 Pro tier appears to be gone) and there is no permanent free plan — only a 7-day Pro trial. Confirm the live tiers on Tella’s pricing page before switching (re-verified June 2026). Best for creators and teams who want Loom’s simplicity with far better polish.

Cap — the open-source pick you own

Cap is an open-source screen recorder that’s free for personal use and works offline on Mac and Windows. Its standout for privacy-conscious teams: Cap Pro can store recordings in your own S3 bucket in any region, and the project is self-hostable for full control — a genuine answer to “I don’t want my videos on someone else’s cloud.” If you want Loom’s ease without surrendering data control, start here.

SendRec — EU-hosted and GDPR-native

SendRec is an open-source, self-hosted, EU-hosted Loom alternative built for GDPR from the ground up: EU-only data residency, no external CDNs, no tracking scripts, and auditable code. The self-hosted edition is free with no seat limits. For European organisations whose blocker is data sovereignty rather than features, SendRec is the most direct fit.

OBS Studio — free, local, unlimited

OBS Studio is the long-standing free, open-source recorder and streamer. There’s no cloud, no account and no time limit — recordings are local files you fully own. The trade-off is a steeper learning curve and no built-in hosting, sharing links or AI summaries. Ideal when budget is zero and you don’t need collaboration features.

Screen Studio — studio-quality Mac demos

Screen Studio is a Mac-only recorder famous for automatic smooth zooms, motion-blur cursor and polished output with little effort — perfect for product demos and launch videos. It offers a one-time lifetime licence ($229) or a monthly plan ($9) (pricing per third-party trackers; verify on the vendor site, June 2026). Recording is local; there’s no mandatory cloud.

Vidyard — built for sales

Vidyard leans into sales prospecting: deep viewer analytics, CRM integrations (Salesforce, HubSpot) and video for outreach. It has a free tier for individuals, with paid sales tiers priced well above Loom. Choose it if conversion analytics and CRM workflows matter more than price.

Scribe — when a doc beats a video

Sometimes the best “Loom alternative” isn’t video at all. Scribe auto-captures your clicks and turns them into a step-by-step guide with screenshots — faster to skim than a recording and easier to keep updated. Great for SOPs, onboarding and help docs; pair it with a recorder for the cases that genuinely need motion.

▶ Want recordings that never leave your control? If the reason you’re leaving Loom is data residency, prioritise tools you can self-host or pin to an EU region — like SendRec (EU-only, self-hosted) or Cap (bring-your-own storage). The principle that makes those safe — process and store where you, not a US cloud, control it — is the same one Kuno applies to in-person conversations: on-device capture, EU hosting, no training on your data. More on that below. Get early access → (Pre-launch)

Is there a free Loom alternative?

Yes — several. The genuinely free options fall into two camps: fully free/open-source tools and free tiers of paid products.

What is the best open-source Loom alternative?

For most people, Cap is the best open-source Loom alternative: it’s polished, cross-platform, free for personal use, and lets you self-host or use your own storage. SendRec is the strongest choice when EU data residency and GDPR are the priority, and OBS Studio wins for pure, no-cloud local recording. All three give you something Loom can’t: the source code and the option to keep every recording on infrastructure you control.

Which Loom alternative is best for GDPR and data sovereignty?

If your blocker is where the data lives, rank tools by hosting control, not features. SendRec (EU-only, self-hosted) and Cap (own-region storage, self-hostable) lead. EU-based managed tools and locally-recording apps (Screen Studio, OBS — files stay on your machine) also keep data off third-party clouds. Mainstream US cloud tools can still be compliant via DPAs and certifications — but compliance and data sovereignty are not the same thing: sovereignty is about who could ultimately access the data and under whose jurisdiction it sits.

⚠️ Compliance ≠ sovereignty. A US-hosted tool can hold SOC 2 and offer a GDPR DPA and still leave your recordings under US jurisdiction. If that distinction matters to you, choose EU-hosted, self-hosted or local-only tools — and verify the hosting region in writing.

Best Loom alternative for Mac, Windows and Chrome

Platform narrows the field quickly:

How do I switch from Loom without losing my videos?

Migrate before you cancel. The order that avoids data loss:

1. Export or download your existing Loom videos while the account is still active (paid Loom plans allow downloads).
2. Pick the replacement and, if it offers one, use a migration/import tool — Tella, for example, has a dedicated Loom migration tool.
3. Re-create shared links in the new tool and update any embeds (Notion, Confluence, help docs, emails) so old links don’t 404.
4. Reconnect integrations (Slack, CRM) on the new tool before switching off Loom.
5. Only then downgrade or cancel Loom — keep it read-only for a grace period in case you missed an embed.

📋 Migration checklist ☐ Download/export all Loom recordings · ☐ Confirm new tool’s hosting region · ☐ Import via migration tool if available · ☐ Update embeds & shared links · ☐ Reconnect Slack/CRM · ☐ Cancel Loom last

Common mistakes when choosing a Loom alternative

• Comparing sticker price only. The cheap tier often excludes analytics, custom branding or seats you need — compare like-for-like.
• Ignoring where recordings are hosted. A low price with US-only hosting can be a problem in EU/regulated contexts; check the region and DPA.
• Forgetting migration. Switching without exporting your Loom library first risks losing recordings when the plan downgrades.
• Buying features you won’t use. Sales analytics (Vidyard) or studio zooms (Screen Studio) are wasted if you just send quick walkthroughs.
• Using a screen recorder for an in-person meeting. If the “video” you want is a recap of a room conversation, no screen recorder fits — see below.

Troubleshooting: when your Loom alternative falls short

When the real job isn’t screen recording: capturing in-person meetings

Here’s the honest edge case every Loom-alternatives list ignores. People often reach for Loom to share what happened in a conversation — a client meeting, a site visit, a field interview. But Loom and every tool above record a screen or a webcam. None of them capture the room. If that’s your actual job — turning an in-person meeting into a transcript and summary — a screen recorder is the wrong category, and a meeting bot can’t help either (there’s no call to join). What fits is a dedicated voice recorder that transcribes locally. That’s where Kuno sits — not as a Loom competitor for screen videos, but as the tool for the conversations screens can’t capture. Kuno is a privacy-first AI voice recorder, made in Germany, that records and transcribes in-person meetings on-device, with EU data hosting and no training on your recordings. A visible recording indicator shows everyone when it’s on, and a one-tap stop pauses instantly — so consent stays clean. If your reason for leaving Loom is data sovereignty, the same logic applies to the meetings you can’t screen-record.

▶ Capture in-person meetings without sending them to a US cloud. Loom records your screen; Kuno records the room. It captures and transcribes face-to-face meetings and field conversations on a device made in Germany — on-device, EU-hosted, never used to train AI — with a visible recording indicator and one-tap stop so everyone knows when it’s recording. Get early access → Kuno for in-person meetings (Pre-launch)

What is Kuno?

Kuno is a privacy-first AI voice recorder, made in Germany, that captures and transcribes in-person meetings on-device with EU data hosting and no training on your recordings. It’s built for the conversations software bots and screen recorders can’t reach — face-to-face meetings, site visits and field work — turning them into a clean transcript and summary while the audio stays with you.

Kuno is a privacy-first AI voice recorder, made in Germany, that captures and transcribes in-person meetings on-device, with EU data hosting and no training on your recordings. Related: best free screen recorder · open-source screen recording tools · how to record an in-person meeting · GDPR-compliant meeting recording · best AI voice recorder 2026